PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): Are my videos sexist?
Added 2024-05-22 00:08:22 +0000 UTC
Comments
@Joseph i’ve always had the opposite opinion, that men are morally & spiritually superior if anything. Hierarchy goes God > Man > Woman > Child. That has certainly been my personal experience.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-08-01 21:30:34 +0000 UTC@Joseph The benefits of regular semen exposure are not huge, but they are there. I see I failed to respond to one of your earlier messages as well. You completely misinterpreted my comment on male versus female libido. I think the idea of men being more libidinous is indeed a new concept. Suboptimal health = bad diet, lack of exercise, excessive stress, toxin exposure etc lowers libido in both sexes but is particularly well established in women. Largely due to hormonal imbalance e.g. the high rates of PCOS. Circumcision makes sex worse for both parties & intact men are also less psychologically damaged. Check out: http://sexasnatureintendedit.com/ I think media negatively affects women in the sense that it lowers their self-esteem and so they have difficulty feeling sexy and truly relaxing and enjoying sex. I’d also argue that the Abraham religions have not been good for women’s sexuality, so at least they do restrain them. Still, I believe it is possible to restrain women’s sexuality without suppressing it. Women gain libido with age for a couple reasons. One, they become more comfortable with their bodies with more experience & time. Two, their testosterone rises with age (especially after menopause). And I suspect that childbearing creates positive changes as well. I don’t think I could be any more clear about what I mean by sexually focused. Most books that most women read and write contain way more sex than books written or read by men. Thus the success of romance as a genre. I agree with JBP that women are archetypically chaotic; we are of the earth and the mundane while men are of the sky and the abstract/intellectual.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-08-01 21:20:25 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - That has GOT to be one of THE most sexually flattering things I've EVER heard a woman say! 😜 Still, I suspect the effect may likely be more psychosomatic than physiological -- if a woman is so much into the sheer SUBMISSIVE glee of the very IDEA of insemination, then she is already halfway towards her ideal feminine energetic state, and only needs the slightest of nudges to tip into conceptual/spiritual ecstasy. As such, though I greatly admire the motivation behind the inadvertent skewing of any reported results, I remain cautiously (yet erotically) skeptical.
Joseph Omega
2024-07-24 21:38:44 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Sometimes a T-Shirt is just a gift. 😄 I'm certainly NOT anti-human -- some of my best friends are! Women have ALWAYS considered themselves "morally superior" to men, as far as I know: "The meek (weak) shall inherit the earth" is a sentiment as old as time -- in turn, children are considered morally superior to women. No news here. As such, it makes perfect sense for women to "disregard/discount male spiritual agency": We're just spiritually weak aren't we?
Joseph Omega
2024-07-24 21:12:15 +0000 UTC@Eric oh and how old is your wife?
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 22:35:48 +0000 UTC@Eric i’m always so happy to hear about older people having the best sex of their lives. And I do hear it quite a lot, but it is always a nice reminder. I’ve never used toys & was only briefly on hormonal birth control (I tried basically all of them for 1-4wks, with mostly disastrous results). I’ve never had bad sex either, thankfully.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 22:23:49 +0000 UTC@Joseph Regular exposure to semen for women has physical and psychological benefits, ideally vaginally but even orally. it boosts bonding, improves her mood/mental health, increases the chance of pregnancy (even if she isn’t fertile at the time), & I think I even read about it having positive effects on the immune system. I can tell you from personal experience that it makes me feel great! Sex without jizz inoculation isn’t really sex to me.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 22:14:05 +0000 UTC@Joseph Well, I can’t agree that humans are the worst. I do have a pretty low opinion of humanity in general, but I don’t think it’s good to foster anti-human sentiment, especially in this age. Completely agree with your latest comment except, how did women traditionally disregard male spiritual agency? I have a headache so maybe I’m just not getting it because of that.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 22:11:23 +0000 UTC@Joseph Actually I meant that it’s more important for women to look good because of men’s preference for looks; so our views align. But yes, of course women care more about their looks mostly for the above reason. Yes, most of the world is very collectivist except for Scandinavia and the US.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 22:07:44 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden The switch definitely exists in many women, including my first wife (who was on hormonal birth control as you said). My second wife, no. My third wife, definitely not. The Happy Wife School has great info, but she doesn't get everything right. She doesn't have kids, and has never been through an actual divorce, so she is missing certain life experiences. As for what women need with sex, I think most women need what I said, based on my own experiences with women. But every woman is different. You obviously know what works for you better than most women. As a man in my 50s, I am having the best sex of my life. My wife would say the same. She has never used a toy or hormonal birth control, and I think that is a big part of it. I totally agree with what you said about male and female libido - binding men to her and control vs. pleasure and romantic union. By "semen inoculation," do you mean getting rid of old sperm?
Eric Linden
2024-06-10 20:03:07 +0000 UTC@Peter - Indeed. Men do not easily "turn on a dime". Remember that it is not OUR "prerogative" to change our minds.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-10 01:36:57 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - As far as the "The Happy Wife School" is concerned, she regularly makes it a point to reiterate that her channel is for women with "good men". I don't recall any video she's made that addresses "wrong men". Yes, I very much suspect you ARE very atypical with respect to the "switch", and the "healthy relationships" are, BY DEFINITION, not the ones where such a phenomenon is likely to occur, and so not the target audience for women who need "schooling". "The man’s orgasm is absolutely essential however - sex is not complete without it" seems a rather obvious TRUISM that is not often highlighted by the Matriarchy. And your expression "regular semen inoculation" made me laugh! 🤣 I'd be VERY intrigued to discover what you believe it "inoculates" you AGAINST? Feminism? 😄
Joseph Omega
2024-06-10 01:30:22 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Interesting how you think "romantic union" is more complex than pleasure--most men think them both VERY simple and direct: There is LUST and there is CHIVALRY, and ne'er the twain shall meet--but 'tis sweet when they overlap!
Joseph Omega
2024-06-10 01:14:42 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Oh, now I understand: Women care more about their OWN looks than men do about theirs. This I DO agree with wholeheartedly. I thought you were speaking about intergender preferences--women caring more about the looks of men over men caring about the looks of women. My mistake. Interesting about German law versus US law, but perfectly consistent with the portrayed stereotypes of Germans and Americans. And I understand now your use of the term "collectivist". Indeed American self-definition is VERY "freedom" and "rights" based, rather than "duty" and "obligation" based as it is in MOST of the world, not just Germany.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-10 01:03:19 +0000 UTCI thought that bit about the switch was kinda wierd. I cant just instantly change what turns me on Shaping and conditioning maybe. But not a turn on a dime
Peter
2024-06-07 12:45:09 +0000 UTC@Peter I think she’s full of crap, & not some fount of truth. At least based on that clip. The ‘switch’ is due to birth control & modern society, not some innate wiring in women.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-06-07 12:42:19 +0000 UTC@Joseph The female libido is definitely of a different flavour. It’s more about connection (binding men to her, control), I think, & personal fulfilment (feeling desired). Whereas for men it’s both simpler (pleasure) & more complex (romantic union).
RhodiumMaiden
2024-06-07 12:39:35 +0000 UTC@Eric I don’t agree with that video/The Happy Wife AT ALL. I think what she describes is a modern phenomenon (based on women who choose the wrong men, often because they’re on hormonal birth control) and not some innate switch. I have certainly never experienced anything like that. And I know I’m not typical, but in the healthy relationships I’ve observed the women have plenty of libido. Btw, I don’t need a clitoral orgasm, but I have a very sensitive g spot & penetration alone gets me off fastest & best. Also not all women can experience anything beyond clitoral orgasms. And women are not necessarily miserable if we don’t orgasm. I’ve been on meds that made it impossible & I still enjoyed sex. My orgasms are great but they’re not essential. The man’s orgasm is absolutely essential however - sex is not complete without it. And regular semen inoculation is very important.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-06-07 12:34:22 +0000 UTCGerman law is very collectivist - focused on the harmony of society over the freedom of individuals. It’s very striking vs US law. I don’t know if German law has long been this way, but I suspect it has. Appearance is more important for women because men care about looks in a partner more than women do (though women still care a lot too). I don’t care about popular opinion or feminist opinion. I care about truth.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-06-07 12:26:42 +0000 UTCIt is pro-rationale, pro-logic. It describes more clearly the reasoning's and the rationale beneath the behaviors in a way I really wish I would have known sooner in life. It gives some basis to the objective facts.
iamsamoth
2024-06-05 14:30:43 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Even "unconditional woman-worship" is not particularly new--men have traditionally easily tended to overdo "chivalry", often with near complete disregard for the feelings or desires of the targets of their romantic fealty. Traditionally, inanimate objects like one's homeland, battleship, aircraft, vehicle and natural phenomona (including hurricances and Mother Nature herself) as well as abstract concepts like Justice, Liberty, Love etc. have been given female pronouns and often female names. When caught up in the throes of passionate romantic fervor (as produced much of the great genius works of art, edifice and lyrical poetry and music), there seems few wonders that males are incapable of producing. As you correctly indentfied, the VAST majority of technical and technological accomplishments across history and cultures have been largely as a result, either directly or indirectly, of men being "inspired" to woo and win affection or favor from, or "for the love of", women. "Obsession" does little to capture the degree to which human males have traditionally been driven to excel, often at the cost of their own lives, for human females. Hence the now popular idea that men "have a history of Misogyny" (or "hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against women") has only relatively recently left the realm of the preposterous. The ONLY thing that has substantially changed, to my mind, is the elimination (by "Western" Feminism) of the natural complemetary appreciation and gratitude of women in response to this male phenomenon. At the very WORST, men have traditionally largely disregarded female physicial agency--this may have been unfortunate from a full resource utilization point of view, but should not IN ANY WAY be confused with "Misogyny". In fact, across the same eons, WOMEN have traditionally largely DISREGARDED male spiritual and moral agency, so there. As it is, there is only now developing (as a knee-jerk reaction to naive Feminist excesses) a gradual erosion of the natural complemetary appreciation and gratitude of men for the "feminine source" of their inspiration. My niece recently gave me a T-shirt that sums it up best, I think. It says "Humans Are The WORST!" (with a sketch of a "Gray" holding its head in utter bemusement).
Joseph Omega
2024-06-03 06:47:06 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - I agree: Most men don't really care all that much about female IQ, except insofar as it is used to enhance the understanding and beneficial utilization of "redpill truths" to optimize their femininity. If high IQ gets in the way of this process (or actively undermines it), then the VAST majority of high OR low IQ men would PASSIONATELY dislike it. Why "Germanic" I wonder, and what exactly do you mean by "collectivist"--does it have something to do with my references to "society"? Still, I never got the impression that there was anything in these laws intended to imply any limitations on the maintenance or improvement by either gender of any aspects of themselves. Just as I suspect Asimov never intended similar for his Robots. I believe these laws were designed for baseline application, not "broad" use--to offset the existential threats posed by the "Gender Wars", just as Asimov apparently intended for HIS laws to offset the existential threats posed by advanced AI. Can you elaborate on your contention that "appearance may be more important for women"? This seems contrary to almost all popular opinion on this topic of which I am aware--including Feminist ones.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-02 11:43:25 +0000 UTCIt is good for men to be inspired by & want to please women (we wouldn’t have most art & tech otherwise), but the current simpish level of unconditional woman-worship (but not actual femininity) is excessive, particularly in combination with the persecution of masculinity. Agree 💯 with what you said re: feminism.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-06-02 00:22:05 +0000 UTC@Joseph Yes, I’m definitely sapiosexual but I’m also very visual. Not so much during sex, when I most often have my eyes closed, but certainly in terms of finding men attractive. But my visual preferences are not nearly as limiting as my intellectual ones. And yes, I’m hypergamous about IQ but men don’t tend to care overly much about it, generally. Some men even dislike high IQ women, at least romantically, & I can understand that too. Very Germanic, collectivist Laws (been a while since I read Asimov). Decent draft but I think both men & women should try to maintain/improve all aspects of themselves continuously. Appearance may be more important for women but it’s still important for men. Also, shouldn’t women improve their competence too? Basically I’d make it broader, though I understand why you went for simplicity & contrast.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-06-02 00:13:28 +0000 UTCPeter’s 2nd video link discusses Rollo and his comments. One of AG’s best ever. The last 5 seconds are priceless!
Eric Linden
2024-05-31 13:56:29 +0000 UTCIt’s definitely a reason why i stuck around after my redpill rage phase. When the anger of my lot subsided. Not completely gone bit alex is not feeding into it. I don’t know about lables when people discuss the lable more the contents of the issue the lable hinders the subject. And there is no way to being up the rather rational topics alex discusses while have any mention of pills Anything past that point is “dismissed “ ad part of an ideology 🤷♀️ Even if it alligns with RP moderate 😋
Peter
2024-05-31 13:33:27 +0000 UTCThanks Peter. I agree with what he says about red pill extremism. Note Rollo Tomassi himself commented on that video. And it’s not a supportive comment. This video explains why he pulled away from calling himself red pill, though I believe he still is a red pill moderate.
Eric Linden
2024-05-31 13:25:20 +0000 UTCAlexander did a whole video about it let me find it https://youtu.be/15xHCCHLSp8?si=7TZKwx0_U4nvQXIY He got serious ro backlash for that https://youtu.be/UY5BecCBZlE?si=LBYES6K2w-ycod7H
Peter
2024-05-31 04:51:08 +0000 UTCAlexander did a whole video about it let me find it https://youtu.be/15xHCCHLSp8?si=7TZKwx0_U4nvQXIY He got serious ro backlash for that
Peter
2024-05-31 04:47:50 +0000 UTCI think partly because of demonisation. But also because the red pill community is so diverse that your detractors will pick an extreme red pill figure and pigeonhole you as holding all those beliefs. I am red pill but I disagree with lots (sometimes 50% or more) of what Andrew Tate, Pearl Davis, or F&F espouse.
Eric Linden
2024-05-30 18:03:26 +0000 UTCBut WHY does Alexander not identify as redpill? Is it solely to avoid being demonetized? Has the term been allowed to evolve so far beyond its Matrix roots?
Joseph Omega
2024-05-30 15:39:35 +0000 UTCThat happy wife school killed my morning 😋 wonderful causionary tale
Peter
2024-05-30 08:51:20 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I too am a great fan of "The Happy Wife School" channel! Her deeply personal and candid insights into the female mind (from a woman's perspective) is an invaluable supplement to Alexander's. I myself also consider the particular video clip you shared to be probably her most poignant and moving, and does indeed explain a LOT about this phenomenon of the stark (apparent) reduction in sexual desire in women post wedding and (usually the first) child. I use the word "apparent", as the desire has been known to suddenly reignite during "illicit affairs". This phenomenon supports @RhodiumMaiden's contention that the desire may not dissipate as expected with time and age. Also, the apparently overnight advent of wildly explicit and PUBLIC displays of highly provocative attire and sexual behavior among modern women of late (across a surprisingly WIDE range of ages) certainly challenges the notion of a less intense female libido--American women are starting to behave quite unashamably (especially in festive--read "club"--settings) in ways traditionally associated with pornographic films, while bragging about "high body counts" (in the tens and hundreds), reminiscent of teenage boy fantacies and exaggerations of old. And of course there is the astounding proliferation and success of the "OnlyFans" franchise, with their overnight millionaires. Still, I can't help but feel that the female sexual desire illustrated by these recent phenomena is of a fundamentally distinct type from the well-known male version, with the former possibly more driven by an "emptiness to be filled", rather than the "raw primal animal urge" normally associated with the latter. I would like to know more.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-30 08:38:34 +0000 UTCMen really are the true romantics. Men and women are different. In general (RM is the exception), women occasionally have a bigger sex drive than men, but not often. Men are more consistent. At times, women can be the bigger sex maniacs. After the ring, the wedding, and the first baby, something big changes in women, which is explained here: https://youtu.be/9FC_AahxWZ4?si=3vuixg6tHW8fdcwp We all have a shorter attention span than we used to. In the 1970s, a myth was created that sex was better the longer it lasted. I bought into it. Quantity (length of time) over quality is a myth. The truth is both men and women need three things in the actual act: a clitoral orgasm, a vaginal orgasm, and a male orgasm, usually in that order. That can take various amounts of time. Alexander actually discussed some of this in a video here on Patreon. It is also true that women are sexually suppressed by modern things like hormonal birth control and toys, the culture, and social media. And some men are suppressed by video games and porn.
Eric Linden
2024-05-30 03:27:11 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Would you say you consider yourself "sapiosexual" then? Can't speak for all men, but I don't get the impression we are, as a group, as consistently discriminating. We certainly tend to be VISUAL first and foremost, and high IQ largely only to the extent that it faciliates and enhances femininity and red-pill knowledge of men (and themselves). There are, of course, high IQ men who APPRECIATE high IQ women, but it seldom influences our commitment and loyalty significantly. As a fellow avid consumer of SF, you may appreciate the following rough draft of the modification of Asimov's Laws applied to men and women: WOMEN'S LAWS OF COMMITMENT Zeroth Law: A woman may not harm society, or, by inaction, allow society to come to harm. First Law: A woman may not harm her family, or, by inaction, allow her family to come to harm, except possibly where such behavior would conflict with the Zeroth Law. Second Law: A woman must submit to the leadership of her man, except where such submission would conflict with the Zeroth or First Law. Third Law: A woman must enhance her own appearance and grace, as long as such enhancement does not conflict with the Zeroth, First, or Second Law. MEN'S LAWS OF COMMITMENT Zeroth Law: A man may not harm society, or, by inaction, allow society to come to harm. First Law: A man may not harm his family, or, by inaction, allow his family to come to harm, except possibly where such behavior would conflict with the Zeroth Law. Second Law: A man must rise to the leadership of his family, except where such leadership would conflict with the Zeroth or First Law. Third Law: A man must enhance his own stature and competence, as long as such enhancement does not conflict with the Zeroth, First, or Second Law.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-29 21:49:50 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Then we may be in agreement that the PERCEPTION of men as possessing higher-libido ("sex maniacal" or "rapacious") is not particularly NEW to the "West", unless I misread you. As I said, the reality may be anyone's guess. I think there is something to the idea that in European-influenced ("White") cultures, women are percieved in modern times as being "at least as libidinous as men," but this MAY be related to the the overwhelming prevalence of the technology and media that supports pornography in the "West", the rapid rise and shameless popularity of the "sexual revolution" within "Western" Feminism based on the idea of promiscuity as representing "female empowerment", and all the similar trappings and hypocrisies associated with what I like to call the West's "Gender Civil War". But, with my possible greater understanding and experience of the "non-White world", it is indeed true that "White" women are largely percieved as more "slutty" than those in "indigenous" populations (read as akin to "Earth Girls are Easy"). I THINK I understand the others, but can you elaborate more on the how and why of "suboptimal health" and "male circumcision" being factors contributing to the suppression of female sexual desire? And as far as "body-image- obsessed media", are you suggesting that, perhaps, women are somehow shamed into such suppression because many/most perceive that they are not attractive enough to be sexually desired? From what I understand, the vast VAST majority of women (as opposed to the VAST majority of men) only need "open their legs" to precipitate sexual activity. Are you of a different opinion? Interesting your speculation that women may actually GAIN libido with age (while even men LOSE libido, albeit less, during the same period). I don't think I've ever heard such a concept presented. Can you elaborate on the hormonal justification for such a development? And what do you mean by "sexually-focused" (I understand the greater "emotional" component, but you appear to be implying the "physical")? I've heard the "more primal" hypothesis famously presented by Jordan Peterson in "the feminine as a represetation of chaos" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXS6PdpRksI) and "the feminine as a representation of Nature" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNjn-U3Ckr0). Certainly women appear to be "more ruled by emotions" than men are, but whether this translates into these two archetypes remains a subject of some speculation for me. But, being male, the "quintessential romantic" in me (and in Jordan) would CERTAINLY enjoy fantasizing this to be true--after all, there MUST be a logical explanation and justification for us being so enamored with such a (to our mind) "rediculously and unecessarilly complex and contradictory creature" such as yourselves. You may have seen variants of this clip: https://www.tiktok.com/@demidelanuit/video/7288488935028722990?q=men%20lover%20harder&t=1717054203940 where it is asserted that "women love easier, but men love harder", supporting your contention that "men are the real romantics".
Joseph Omega
2024-05-29 20:14:19 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - I personally see no particular issue necessarilly in the pedestalisation of women (men natrually tend to idolize and idealize that which they prize most dearly)--it is the hatred/mockery of men that is profoundly problematic. This represents the cultural imbalance that is threatening to unravel all of "Western" civilization. Feminism, to my mind and the way it was allowed to initiate, develop and proliferate, was based on the flawed idea that "hard power" and "soft power" were mismatched in cultural influence--men and women co-evolved as veritable "symbiotes" for so long that this would make little evolutionary sense to me.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-29 17:53:05 +0000 UTC@Joseph I believe that amongst white people (I cannot comment on other races as I don’t know them well enough), women are at least as libidinous as men. There are a number of reasons why (modern) women SEEM & often ARE sexually suppressed - suboptimal health, hormonal birth control, male circumcision, & body-image- obsessed media are major factors. Also porn availability makes men seem more sexually rapacious than they are imo. And ofc, women have multiple reasons to avoid sex that men do not, and so they don’t always act on their libido as much as men might. But essentially I think it comes down to what Greeks (& Medieval Europeans) believed, which is that women are more emotional/irrational & men are more disciplined mentally. I don’t think it’s at all natural for women to lose libido with age more so than men (hormonally, it makes more sense than women actually gain libido with age, while men lose). Also, I think men are the real romantics, generally, while women are much more earthy & practical about sex fundamentally. Porn & modernity have distorted this, so it’s not so obvious, but a good way to see this is how men write about sex vs women. Women are MUCH more sexually-focused than men. Also emotionally, ofc. Men tend to have more idealistic views of women than we do of you. Maybe it’s because we are more primal in a sense, more in our bodies & ruled by them, than men.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-29 17:49:25 +0000 UTC💯 agree Joseph. Best to be very cautious or at least self-aware about value judgements. I’m also a huge fan of SF & fantasy. Btw, I shared our Hoeflation chat with a close friend and he said ‘what an autistic convo’. 😂 On both sides, he meant. Generally anyone worth having long discussions with is not a normie, ime. And yes, I’m aware that I’m very pro high IQ, high functioning ND people. :)
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-29 17:32:56 +0000 UTC@Peter - Fascinating article. However, the question of the gender comparison of the overall desire for sex (the libido) was not addressed in favor of a discussion of the capacity to control it. The article appears to concentrate far more on trying to refute traditional and historic scholarship of the study of sexual desire (repeatedly calling it "androcentric") than an independent study of the nature and degree of the phenomenon itself. Also, the applicability of the theorizings of Greek and Roman philosophers to the perceptions of the average citizen of these two civilizations or to any others in the much larger world at that time or since is very debatable--it's like comparing the modern academic or activist or politically correct view on gender and sexuality to what is considered "common sense" on the streets (or in forums like this one).
Joseph Omega
2024-05-29 16:54:45 +0000 UTChttps://womeninantiquity.wordpress.com/2023/03/28/female-pleasure/ In greek times. Women were considered the less rational and more emotional ones wjo gave into their urges. The uncontrolled sex drive , generally being uncontrolled , was something attributed to women. But no idea that has just trying to warn men or those ravenous and emotional and undisciplined women…. To keep them on the straight and narrow
Peter
2024-05-29 13:36:22 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Indeed it does. Thanks for the clairification. And I agree: EVERYONE "disciminates"--it is part of the rationization and pattern recognition process built into the "Sapiens" aspect of our humanity. However, I try not to be too comfortable with any conscious perceptions I might develop that "one race is inherently SUPERIOR to another" (racism) or that "one gender is inherently SUPERIOR to the other" (sexism). Value judgements are often quite fickle, and occasionally come back to haunt our reasoning and self-definition. I feel it is best to be conscious of our biases, and to suspend evaluating the absolute valuation of any given trait until the very last moment prior to having to act upon it. In the meantime, I prefer to creatively investigate the pros and cons, real and potential usefulness and detriments, as well as the context of the development and maintenance of such traits through the lens of "Intellectual Humility". I believe it helps to be an avid fan of Speculative Fiction, such that questions as "What are the redeeming (or even superior) attributes of Klingon physiology and culture compared with Earthlings?" becomes second nature.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-29 07:06:25 +0000 UTCIt’s only very recently that the West began painting men as the sex maniacs. For most of history, women have been depicted thus & I think it’s more accurate, though I’m certainly biased bc of my own high sex drive.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-27 16:44:36 +0000 UTCI see the pedestalisation of women & the hatred/mockery of men (unless maybe they are gay or nonwhite) constantly everywhere, in most Western countries. It’s much hard to think of a place where I DONT see that. Maybe modern South Korean culture, but I only know a bit & haven’t been there.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-27 16:42:40 +0000 UTCAG did a better job probably, but what I mean is that, there are innate gender differences, this is just a fact. I know terms like racist, sexist etc are supposed to be derogatory, but I no longer view them that way. Largely because those terms are generally misused. Daring to notice & comment on reality will get you called these names. Plus, everyone judges. Everyone discriminates based on innate traits, whether they realise it or not. I don’t believe it’s possible for humans to be completely unbiased & ignoring these traits is also very foolish. Does that make more sense?
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-27 16:37:50 +0000 UTC@Alisha - It's all of the above plus everything else. "Being told to idealise women" is in no way a recent phenomenon across cultures. Seems so strange that you would think to ask. Doesn't "Sugar and spice and everything nice" not say it all?
Joseph Omega
2024-05-24 09:59:52 +0000 UTCCan you better explain just the phrase "REALITY is sexist"? It appears such an unusual expression.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-24 09:49:09 +0000 UTCThat WOULD put a positive spin on it for you, certainly.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-24 09:46:15 +0000 UTCTldr: where is the accountability for the people (best friends ) who knowingly engaged the cheating with the best friends girlfriend… a snake in your own house! A piece of human shaped diehorea! —— Whats obviously devious, is the things these girls will do and probably many a woman has done… (Setting aside the terrible bias of street interviewing drunk party people. Buy virtue of that, you don’t have the highest morals or standards or are attempting to self soothe with Vices , drugs or alcohol or party or sex. Aaaaand you are yolo+ fuckit enough, to broadcast your shamelessness online!which again probably means you’re more likely to engage in depravity, yolo after all !) What is shocking, is that its shocking. We have been fed this narrative of women as purer. (The greek saw women as easily tempted sex maniacs, and men as the reserved ones)so long that when they engage in the same stuff as the guy, we take their depravity as shocking. And men we think “more of the usual “ Not suprising Of all the comments i have not seen none are holding the men those sirens engaged with accountable Like, That girl cheated with her bfs best mate.. What a dispicable slimy backstabbing snake of a human turd KNOWING sleeps with his friends GF. Cheating with some rando, she could have lied. A good person gets in bed with her not knowing she is in a relationship. But irl, men often know. They are too horny and opportunistic to pass up some WAP. And thus the men , or the “home wreckers”, male or female.. should not get the full blame, but they played a part in this two. They dont get of scott free. The purchaser and the seller. Who gets more or less blame or equal, or what ever… but there is some ratio to devide umongst both Thats why i hate players. Like that mate, they engage with the evil. Are part of the problem And me… Im left with the chewed end of the stick Humans are shittty We don’t expect it from women We arnt surprised my men Both should be judged harshly
Peter
2024-05-23 21:17:13 +0000 UTCI second alot of what mark said. Orion had a nice talk about respect means different things fir men and women. And you are told to respect women. Everywhere. And respect for men means looking up to. I cant fathom the way some women interact with authority, a boss or the like. Like simply asking them to explain themselves. Or ask why. As if they are equals or higher than them. A person you respect is an authority and you are by definition below them. Otherwise you wouldn’t consider them an authority And thus by definition you put yourself below them Ie idolise etc
Peter
2024-05-23 16:57:38 +0000 UTCMother, childhood education, popular culture, and news media. Popular culture presents the image of men being incompetent who are dependent on competent women. Especially family men.
Mark Bryski
2024-05-23 07:41:53 +0000 UTC@E C - I meant "women are not as constrained" by a lack of opportunity. As a result there are VERY FEW obstacles to restrain them from cheating. As a woman you have the LUXURY of "turning down many options". Kudos to you, but the VAST number of men do NOT possess such luxuries. I'm not sure I would consider women more "virtuous" as a result, but perhaps just more narcissistically selective.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-23 06:01:40 +0000 UTCOops, that was a little bit spontaneous adjacent Lack of impulse control i guess. But if it’s just about random adjacent thoughts, perhaps it’s not that bad and something I can still work on Have a good one 🙋♀️
Peter
2024-05-23 04:23:31 +0000 UTC*ist. I think should be defined as a discrimination based apon that trait. A descriminant as in the mathematical sense. A point of choosing one path or other. A decing point Öike big than or smaller than is a descriminant And if that is solely or largely based on a contextless factor, you have an *ism Height ism, weight ism, sex ism, age ism, race ism. Etc I have an issue with isms, not because of them as such but the contextlessness. It’s rarely just black-and-white like you don’t have to necessarily be tall to be a basketball player. There is always extra factors that can make you qualified or unqualified for a certain thing.
Peter
2024-05-23 04:21:46 +0000 UTCIm sure the difference is alot more nuanced and contextual Bit yeah in general i would see men often as hammers Women as scalpels. Plus women have a longevity and tentacty for things. Particularly when they apply their style or warfar, it’s scary to me Guys might blow up and calm down quickly. Women can nag and nitpick and gossip and wear others down over periods where i ask myself Vruv how deep seated is this hate orbdistain than you continue to act on it for months or years Scary stuff I used to be entirely oblivious to that
Peter
2024-05-23 04:10:14 +0000 UTCFid you guys and girls and them, see the new aba n preach video about government funded anti redpill content? https://youtu.be/TFEbdW_X27s?si=c2_DBg5G5nmx1ZS9 I know Alexander doesn’t identify as redpill and the redpill gurus had a right good go at him. But if OTHERS identify him as such….. Times are wild Edit: Alexander did a whole video about it let me find it https://youtu.be/15xHCCHLSp8?si=7TZKwx0_U4nvQXIY He got serious ro backlash for that https://youtu.be/UY5BecCBZlE?si=LBYES6K2w-ycod7H
Peter
2024-05-23 03:50:03 +0000 UTC@E C. I doubt you or anyone on here ever has. I just think more women than men have.
Eric Linden
2024-05-23 02:38:23 +0000 UTCMy guess is men score higher on average in psychopathy, women score higher than average in Machiavellianism and it will be similar for both men and women for narcissism
Alisha
2024-05-22 22:14:00 +0000 UTCWell said Alexander! Your content has always been real! Also, apologies that I am so quiet nowadays, life has been busy with a new job. I would be interested to know from yourself and other men here who exactly comes to mind when it comes to being told to idealise women. Is it family, teachers, TV? Is there a couple of people in your own lives that come to mind?
Alisha
2024-05-22 22:11:44 +0000 UTCBut in the end, more women cheat, usually with Chad, but definitely with the same small group of men. Action over intention.
Eric Linden
2024-05-22 17:13:31 +0000 UTCIt would be interesting for Alexander to examine the dark triad, and how it manifests differently in women than in men. Men are the logical ones and women are emotional; but there is a distinct LACK of emotion in some of the clips of women in this video. Is this a trend in our culture?
Eric Linden
2024-05-22 17:07:19 +0000 UTCThis video should be the pinned and/or featured video on your channel. All my previous attempts at introducing someone to your channel were dismissed because your videos were always pointing out the negatives in women. they deemed you misogynistic and sexist. This video can explain your stance better.
Ashwin Srinivas
2024-05-22 15:39:52 +0000 UTCREALITY is ‘sexist’. You care about both genders despite our differences. That’s the ideal. Acknowledge reality & strive for the best.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-22 10:32:30 +0000 UTCI'm of the opinion that one of the most devastating lies that modern western society has force fed young men is the idealization and pedestalization of women. Just like men, women too are humans, and as such they are just as fallible, and history has shown that women can be in every way as vindictive, vicious, and cruel; men do not have a monopoly in dark personality traits. Those men with sexual abundance learn quickly to see through a woman's nature and disabuse themselves of this lie, while the remaining vast majority learn painfully through unrequited love, or even more costly and devastatingly through marriage and divorce. Our only solace lies in understanding, and only by understanding women's true nature can a man truly -- and truthfully -- love a woman for who she is. That, Alex, has consistently been your mission, and for that, I hope you continue with your endeavor.
Hyperion
2024-05-22 09:25:34 +0000 UTCTrue. Fortunately (or unfortunately) women are not as constrained.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-22 06:45:29 +0000 UTCLack of opportunity is what stops like 80% of men from cheating. It's not really a virtuous choice not to cheat if you are not even in the position to do so.
P A
2024-05-22 06:23:55 +0000 UTCIt is TRULY unfortunate that videos such as these need to be made to explain your motivations and justify your presentations--any balanced, thoughful individual who listens through any of them (rather than are just triggered by the thumbnails) could not logically deduce your "sexism" from its content.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-22 06:10:11 +0000 UTCMore men WANT to cheat. More women ACTUALLY cheat. Men who want to cheat usually can’t. Any woman who wants to cheat easily can. That is reality.
Eric Linden
2024-05-22 03:47:34 +0000 UTCYour videos are the furthest away from sexist. Your videos are informative, based on reason and data, and entertaining (especially some of your reactions to the bizarre shit some of these bizarre humans with a vagina and boobs spit out!). To prove my point, I’m upgrading my Patreon subscription! 😃
vanidotau
2024-05-22 01:34:54 +0000 UTCSociety says men cheat more than women. Most female cheaters do it with the same men. Many women don't consider their infidelity as cheating because they have a "reason." Financial abuse and verbal abuse are considered equal to physical abuse. Emotions are considered justifiable reasons to absolve women of the charge of "cheating." Statistics on cheating are based on self reported data. You decide. Reality.
Eric Linden
2024-05-22 01:30:14 +0000 UTCObviously - haha!
Kerry Blaser
2024-05-22 01:00:08 +0000 UTCAlexander, your videos are sexist to the whim worshippers. In fact, your videos challenge some of status hierarchy signalling mechanisms rooted in misandry. Here is a video discussing the man or bear question. The presenters ask us how would a similar question presented in the form of "black man or bear" or "Jew or bear" be received by the public. https://youtu.be/sjRoMxBRHCc?si=zewwkEfeuD6y4ZGf Myself, I have lived through false allegations of abuse without anything to substantiate it other than the "man or bear" mentality. As soon as it was discovered that my children were abused by the mother, the child protection authorities tried to sweep as much as possible under the carpet.
Mark Bryski
2024-05-22 00:52:01 +0000 UTCI've never seen anything sexist in your videos. I appreciate what you are doing. I'm a religious person, and I admire the way your secular view helps tempor me, also. Keep up the great work.
Jeremy Cherpeski
2024-05-22 00:45:24 +0000 UTCAnswer to the title: No. Keep speaking the truth.
P Bear
2024-05-22 00:38:00 +0000 UTC
