New video, the hyperdarts puzzle, done with Numberphile
Added 2019-11-17 16:00:55 +0000 UTC
Hi Everyone,
Thank you for your patience recently. The video showing the hyperdarts puzzle, with the solution and the surrounding commentary on why I like it, is finally out!
Originally, I had scripted it out and started animating it like an ordinary 3b1b video. But then Brady Haran was in town (he's the man behind Numberphile, for those of you who don't know), and it occurred to me that this one might be more fun to shoot live. Especially since it's centered on a physical game.
Brady did an outstanding job with the edit, I think, and I had fun repurposing and reworking the animations I had started to better fit the new format.
I hope you enjoy and thank you for your support.
-Grant
I love it!
3blue1brown
2019-11-21 05:22:06 +0000 UTC
Here's another good way to think about why adding up P(S>n) gives you the expectation of S:
E[S]=P(S=1)+2P(S=2)+3P(S=3)+4P(S=4)+. . .
=P(S=1)+P(S=2)+P(S=3)+P(S=4)+. . .
+P(S=2)+P(S=3)+P(S=4)+. . .
+P(S=3)+P(S=4)+. . .
+P(S=4)+. . .
The first line is P(S>0)=1. The second line is P(S>1). The third line is P(S>2), and so on.
Daniel and Rebekah Slonim
2019-11-20 19:30:20 +0000 UTC
Thanks for another great video!
Daniel and Rebekah Slonim
2019-11-20 19:26:56 +0000 UTC
That's a great way to think about it!
3blue1brown
2019-11-18 06:12:21 +0000 UTC
Thanks! We had fun making this.
3blue1brown
2019-11-18 05:57:43 +0000 UTC
I think I'll try to keep up some form of live action lessons more. Maybe that will just be as guest appearances elsewhere, or maybe as more of its own thing. Just so long as it doesn't distract from the main visuals-centered content.
3blue1brown
2019-11-18 05:57:02 +0000 UTC
Yup! It's just like this puzzle, but with simplexes instead of spheres.
3blue1brown
2019-11-18 05:55:58 +0000 UTC
Another way to think about how small a high dimensional ball is when compared to a high dimensional hypercube:
In two dimensions there are four corners of the cube (square) outside the ball (disc).
In three dimensions there are eight corners of the cube outside the ball. They take up a larger portion of the cube than they do in two dimensions.
I guess the trend continues, so that there are more and more corners as you go into higher dimensions, eventually taking up most of the space.
Actually if you think of one dimensional balls and spheres, they would be the same thing: segments; the same segment, actually; with no corners of the "square" going beyond the "ball"; i.e., with the same "volume".
Daniel Armesto
2019-11-18 05:10:42 +0000 UTC
The answer to your little quizz is just e. Right?
Daniel Armesto
2019-11-18 05:09:27 +0000 UTC
I finally get why my stomach gets more round when I eat more pi... it adds a dimention! :D
Sorry I will leave now....
Aniket raj
2019-11-18 00:38:20 +0000 UTC
I liked your enthusiasm in real life, which is a nice counterpoint to your calm and analytical animations. You should do this more often!
Boudewijn Redeker
2019-11-17 23:52:04 +0000 UTC
After watching your first two shots, remind me to never play darts with you.
2019-11-17 23:34:54 +0000 UTC
flashin' the new ring! awesome video, i like the comment at the end about how analytic and geometric thinking kind of have opposite intuitions
2019-11-17 22:04:21 +0000 UTC
Great video!
Daniel Armesto
2019-11-17 19:05:29 +0000 UTC
Well done! It was cool getting to see you talking alongside the animations, and very good exposition. Liked how you teased the simpler variation at the end, now I want to see you animate the volume for an n-dimensional unit simplex to illustrate that answer.
Eric Severson
2019-11-17 18:47:49 +0000 UTC
Excellent... Liked the give-and-take discussion, intertwined with the summary graphics
Richard Hackathorn
2019-11-17 18:32:42 +0000 UTC
I think so too! It made me wonder if on 3b1b, it might be beneficial to do more of the equation-presentation with handwriting. It feels a bit more friendly and approachable, like a one-on-one between a student and a tutor.
3blue1brown
2019-11-17 18:20:52 +0000 UTC
A fantastic video, good job to all involved!
Vincent Zalzal
2019-11-17 17:54:49 +0000 UTC
Great combination!! :D I think both your and Numberphile's styles/formats complement each other really well.
Janik
2019-11-17 17:42:47 +0000 UTC
Maybe a little spoiler, but still... "You're not quite twice as good as somebody who has no skill whatsoever" *LOL*
Daniel Brahneborg
2019-11-17 16:57:47 +0000 UTC